I’ve been backtesting different strategies to hedge spot portfolios during low-volume/choppy market conditions (like we saw this weekend).Usually, the standard hedge is opening a short perp position to capture downside. However, in the current market structure, "liquidation hunting" wicks often stop out these hedges before the actual move happens.I’ve been experimenting with a different derivative concept: Pari-Mutuel Volatility Brackets.The Concept: Instead of betting on Direction (Price goes Up/Down), you bet on Magnitude (Which asset will have the highest % move in a fixed timeframe).Scenario A (Directional Hedge): You are Long ETH. You open a Short ETH perp to hedge. Market wicks up 2%, stops you out, then dumps 5%. Result: You lose on both the hedge and the spot.Scenario B (Volatility Hedge): You are Long ETH. You enter a "Volatility Bracket" picking ETH as the highest mover. Market wicks up 2%, then dumps 5%. Result: ETH wins the volatility bracket because it moved the most (total distance). The payout from the bracket offsets the spot loss.The Mechanism: I’m testing this on a new Arbitrum dApp (CandleWars) that runs 8-hour volatility rounds. It pools liquidity from all entrants and pays out the top 3 assets with the highest absolute percentage change.My Question for the sub: Has anyone modeled the Expected Value (EV) of "Volatility Betting" vs "Straddle Options" in crypto?Pros: No liquidation price, capped risk (entry fee), no theta decay (unlike options).Cons: It's a PVP pool, so payout depends on how many people bet against you.Curious if anyone has experience with this specific type of derivative structure compared to traditional options for hedging chop. via /r/Trading https://ift.tt/l0npgvZ
No comments:
Post a Comment